CMS PAS Compliance Suite FAQ.
Common questions about the CMS-0057-F rule, the four required APIs, Da Vinci PAS, compliance deadlines, deployment options, and licensing.
What is CMS-0057-F?
A CMS rule requiring impacted payers to implement four FHIR-based APIs for prior authorization and data access. The rule applies to:
- Medicare Advantage organizations
- Medicaid managed care plans
- CHIP managed care entities
- Qualified Health Plan (QHP) issuers on federally-facilitated exchanges
API requirements begin January 1, 2027.
What is the Redix CMS-0057-F Prior Authorization Suite?
A software suite (version 2026.1) that provides the four CMS-mandated FHIR APIs plus conversion and workflow tools:
- Patient Access API — members access PA history and coverage data
- Provider Access API — providers query PA status and patient data
- Payer-to-Payer API — consent-based data exchange when members switch plans
- Da Vinci PAS API — PA submission, inquiry, update, and cancel via FHIR
Also includes bidirectional X12 278 to FHIR conversion, CRD coverage requirements discovery, and DTR documentation templates.
Who is required to comply?
CMS-0057-F mandates apply to payers only, not providers. All four APIs are payer obligations. Providers are clients and users of the PAS and Provider Access APIs — they do not host them.
What is the compliance timeline?
- January 2026 — Operational requirements start (expedited and standard PA decision timeframes)
- March 2026 — Initial public reporting milestones
- January 1, 2027 — API requirements start (all four APIs must be live)
What Da Vinci PAS operations are supported?
Da Vinci PAS v2.1.0 (STU 2) with four operations:
- $submit — submit a prior authorization request
- $inquire — check PA status
- $cancel — cancel a PA request
- $update — update an existing PA
Every response includes a ClaimResponse with Provenance tracking for audit traceability.
What about CRD and DTR?
CRD (Coverage Requirements Discovery) uses CDS Hooks to let providers check whether PA is required at point of care. Supports order-select, order-sign, appointment-book, encounter-start, encounter-discharge, and order-dispatch hooks.
DTR (Documentation Templates and Rules) uses FHIR Questionnaires to collect required documentation with pre-populated data fields.
CRD and DTR are provider-side tools defined by Da Vinci Implementation Guides — not CMS-mandated, but they help providers submit better PA requests and reduce denials.
What standards does the suite conform to?
- FHIR R4 (4.0.1) — base interoperability standard
- Da Vinci PAS v2.1.0 — Prior Authorization Support IG
- US Core 3.1.1 — US healthcare profiles
- SMART on FHIR 2.0 — authorization framework
- CDS Hooks — CRD integration
What are the deployment options?
- On-Premises — your data center, full infrastructure control, air-gapped option
- Private Cloud — AWS/Azure/GCP VPC, your cloud account, no shared tenancy
- Containerized — Docker images, Kubernetes ready, Helm charts available
100% self-hosted. PHI remains in your environment with no cloud dependencies or external processing.
What is the processing performance?
Less than 150ms typical end-to-end processing latency. Native C engine with single-pass architecture — no JVM overhead or garbage collection pauses. 99.999% production uptime.
What databases are supported?
- SQLite (default — no separate database server required)
- SQL Server
- Oracle
- PostgreSQL
What are the adoption paths?
- Option A — FHIR-First: RMap to FHIR for organizations without X12 infrastructure. Generate Da Vinci PAS FHIR bundles directly from CSV.
- Option B — Hybrid Bridge: Keep X12 workflows, add FHIR outputs alongside existing EDI systems.
- Option C — Full Suite: All four APIs plus conversion plus audit and provenance tracking.
How does build vs. buy compare?
- Time to production: 12+ months in-house vs. weeks to few months with Redix
- FHIR expertise: Hire/train 3–5 specialists in-house vs. reduced requirement with API-first approach
- X12 278 conversion: Build from scratch vs. built on the AnyToAny Engine
- Da Vinci PAS conformance: Interpret IG, build, and test vs. aligned to v2.1.0
- CMS audit readiness: Build audit trail system vs. FHIR Provenance built-in
- Estimated cost: $1M–$2M+ internal build vs. licensed software
Can I try it before purchasing?
Yes. The Live Sandbox provides several CMS compliance tools:
- CMS PAS 278 tool — submit and inquire PA requests via Da Vinci PAS
- X12 to FHIR converter — convert X12 278 to FHIR R4 bundles
- ePA Workflow Demo — end-to-end CRD → DTR → PAS → approval → payment
- Swagger API Explorer — interactive API documentation with live "Try it out"
No API key required. Do not upload PHI.
What are the licensing requirements?
- AnyToAny Engine — required core product
- CMS-0057-F Suite — four mandated APIs plus PAS conversion
- HIPAA Package — optional add-on for full X12 transaction support (837, 835, 270/271, 276/277, 834, 820)
Modular pricing — add only the components you need.
Still have questions? Contact us or try our AI Chat for instant answers.